Octophile ([info]octophile) wrote,
@ 2009-04-26 18:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood:tired
Current music:The Shivers: Kisses

Mayday
If you want a giant nosegay of opinions about the current state of poetry reviewing,  one such bouquet is up--in pieces, at least--in the first issue of MAYDAY. (Disclaimer: I am one of the contributors.) As usual, in reading the other responses to the prompt--many from people who are NAMES (at least to me)--I am abashed and admiring at once. I believe now that my worst problem is not--as I once feared--a lack of intellectual rigor but a mail suit of archness that seems to grow right out of my skin. It's like I've just noticed I have scales and can you get dermabrasion for that and all? It's as if I can only be serious, and I am dead serious almost always, with my eyebrows raised. ("Serious" doesn't mean "humorless." Really! Look at that giddy souffle with a pellet of lead for a heart!)

I used to worry a lot about being all style and no substance. My thinking on that's changed a bit--style is substance or can be if you're of a certain cast of mind (I am). But if style and rhetoric are, on some level the same thing, your style had damn well better be deft enough and strong enough to merit the identity. And suddenly, suddenly, I am feeling as clumsy and weak and, well, belated as a baby dinosaur. Will there be better lexicons when we grow up?

What course of treatment do they recommend for an allergy to sincerity? Or maybe it's not so much sincerity as sentiment that gives me the hives. It hurts, almost, to give an opinion unqualified by some some attestation as to the partial, subjective and highly idiosyncratic nature of opinion itself. But, of course, I have this baffling gravity about my own opinions, even when I tell you (and I will!) for god's sake, don't take this stuff seriously! I want you to value what I say and, at the same time, to see the idiocy inherent in that judgment. It isn't just, it just is.

That old ankylosaurus always was kind of a loner anyway...
But ankylosaurus, know'st ye not that thou and I am one?




(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]thelican
2009-04-27 04:07 am UTC (link)
Will there be better lexicons when we grow up?

Dear Octophile:

Fail better.

(Which, of course, is a tired thing for me to say already.)

I have a similar feeling about my own writing, which I've only recently started to do regularly again: that realization that, somehow, when I'm writing for the public of publication, I can find no middle ground between an overly sentimentalized sincerity and an archness, or maybe even a disingenuous patrician tone.

I must say, though, that I most often feel like Dr. Cottard with his smile. (Which probably stems from feeling hideously like a baby dinosaur.) Cue, somehow, not the wharffly voice of Eliot or the authoritative tones of Bloom, but, horribly, a Bare Naked Ladies song released and caught by me over a decade ago ("It's All Been Done," I think it's called); and the realization of that in the trickle down of mass culture, before me, must be why it often surfaces in my mind's ear, ten years after the fact.

But congrats, on the writing, anyway.

(Reply to this)


[info]thelican
2009-04-27 02:41 pm UTC (link)
Oh, and okay (I said something about stopping my shipment of Spam), but: I just read your editorial in May Day, and have to say this: at least for someone with my stylistic inclinations, your opinion has all the intellectual rigor of anyone else's (more so, even), but has the distinct advantage of just being more enjoyable to read. Rhetoric is seduction, after all. I'm very much in favor of cultivating a distinct style. And you really shouldn't feel like a baby dinosaur (certainly not anymore than any other innovative writer should).

Also: I like the idea of a review that returns to the format of Swift's Tatler. Given that there is, as everyone acknowledges, such a glut of poetry, the process of selection itself would be part of the review. Then, dedicating two or three readers (with aptly descriptive noms de plume) to every new slim volume would provide something much closer to the kind of literary conversation that is all that so many of us really want (not an axe to grind at all - just a place to compare blades and handles) .

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]octophile
2009-05-03 08:23 pm UTC (link)
This is more encouraging than I can say. And worry not--you are not spam but steak tartare.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…